Main Page
About
Faculty
Dean
Organizational Structure
Academic Accreditations
"Strategic Plan "Ebtesama-Smile
Administration
Vice Deanships
Academic Affairs
Female Section
Graduate Studies and Research
University Dental Hospital
Development
Departments
Diagnostic Oral Sciences
Periodontology
Oral Biology
Oral & Maxillofacial Prosthodontics
Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Endodontics
Restorative Dentistry
Orthodontics
Pediatric Dentistry
Dental Public Health
Goals and Objectives
Education
Bachelor
Interns Program
Postgraduate Studies
Research
University Dental Hospital
Community Services
House of Expertise
Files
Contact Us
Directory of Faculty Staff
عربي
English
About
Admission
Academic
Research and Innovations
University Life
E-Services
Search
Faculty of Dentistry
Document Details
Document Type
:
Article In Journal
Document Title
:
A laboratory evaluation of the physical and mechanical properties of selected root canal sealers
A laboratory evaluation of the physical and mechanical properties of selected root canal sealers
Document Language
:
English
Abstract
:
AIM: To evaluate and compare the porosity, degree of conversion (DC) and hardness of two resin-based sealers; RealSeal and EndoRez, and a silicon-based sealer; GuttaFlow to that of a traditional zinc oxide-based sealer; TubliSeal. METHODOLOGY: For porosity, four samples from each sealer were prepared and scanned using a SkyScan 1072 Micro-CT. Porosity was then calculated using specialized software. For DC, 10 samples from each sealer were prepared and placed onto a Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy spectrometer. Spectra readings were carried out before and after curing of the sealers, and the DC for each sealer was calculated. For hardness, 10 samples from each sealer were prepared and then tested using a Wallace hardness tester. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis of the data using one-way anova and independent t-tests. RESULTS: TubliSeal had the highest percentage porosity (3.52%), whilst RealSeal had the lowest percentage porosity (0.41%). Statistically significant differences (P = 0.01) in porosity were present between all groups except between RealSeal and EndoRez groups. RealSeal exhibited a significantly higher DC% than EndoRez (P = 0.01), whereas EndoRez had the highest hardness number [28.54 Vickers hardness number (VHN)] whilst TubliSeal showed the lowest (13.57 VHN). Statistically significant differences in hardness were found between all groups (P = 0.01) except between RealSeal and EndoRez groups. CONCLUSIONS: Resin-based sealers had less porosity, greater hardness and a high DC
ISSN
:
1
Journal Name
:
Int Endod J
Volume
:
43
Issue Number
:
10
Publishing Year
:
1431 AH
2010 AD
Article Type
:
Article
Added Date
:
Monday, May 30, 2011
Researchers
Researcher Name (Arabic)
Researcher Name (English)
Researcher Type
Dr Grade
Email
عبير مقيم صالح
Saleh, abeer Mokeem
Investigator
Doctorate
Files
File Name
Type
Description
29808.pdf
pdf
Back To Researches Page