Main Page
About
Faculty
Dean
Organizational Structure
Academic Accreditations
"Strategic Plan "Ebtesama-Smile
Administration
Vice Deanships
Academic Affairs
Female Section
Graduate Studies and Research
University Dental Hospital
Development
Departments
Diagnostic Oral Sciences
Periodontology
Oral Biology
Oral & Maxillofacial Prosthodontics
Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Endodontics
Restorative Dentistry
Orthodontics
Pediatric Dentistry
Dental Public Health
Goals and Objectives
Education
Bachelor
Interns Program
Postgraduate Studies
Research
University Dental Hospital
Community Services
House of Expertise
Files
Contact Us
Directory of Faculty Staff
عربي
English
About
Admission
Academic
Research and Innovations
University Life
E-Services
Search
Faculty of Dentistry
Document Details
Document Type
:
Article In Journal
Document Title
:
ANALYSISOF FACTORS LEADING TO HARDWARE REMOVAL OF RIGIDLY FIXED FACIAL FRACTURES
ANALYSISOF FACTORS LEADING TO HARDWARE REMOVAL OF RIGIDLY FIXED FACIAL FRACTURES
Document Language
:
English
Abstract
:
Objectives: THepurpose of this study was to investigate different factors that lead to removal of plates and screws in rigidly fixed facial fractures. Materials and Methods: Records of 44 patients treated by open reduction and rigid internal fixa. tion for maxillofacial fractures were collected and analyzed. A total number of 137 plates including macro. mini and low profile plates were inserted. After fracture healing, patients were followed up once every 6 months. The follow up period ranged from 1.2 to 3.4 years with a mean of 1.9 years. Results: A total number of 137 plates were inserted, 28 plates (20%) were stainless steel and 109 plates (80%) were titanium. A total number of 45 plates (33%) were removed. 19 (68o/c)out of 28 stainless steel plates were removed. 26 (24%) Qut of 109 titanium plates were removed. 11 plates (24%) were removed because of infection. 11 plates (24%) were removed because of tissue break down and plate exposure. 9 plates (21%) were removed because of plate prominence. 5 plates (11%) were removed for secondary procedures as genioplasty & rhinoplasty. 3 plates (7%) were removed because of thermal conductivity. 2 plates (4%) were removed for persistent numbness.2 plates (4%) were removed due to screw loosening. 2 plates (4%) were removed according to patient's request. Conclusion: Through the use of a more biological compatible material, the less bulky implant, vigilant infection control and favorable plate location. the need for removal of plates after facial fracture management may be reduced.
ISSN
:
0
Journal Name
:
Egyptian Dental Journal,
Volume
:
48
Issue Number
:
3
Publishing Year
:
2002 AH
2002 AD
Article Type
:
Article
Added Date
:
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Researchers
Researcher Name (Arabic)
Researcher Name (English)
Researcher Type
Dr Grade
Email
فهمي حسين
Hassanein, Fahmy
Investigator
Doctorate
Files
File Name
Type
Description
25591.pdf
pdf
Back To Researches Page